Home > Scientific studies and reports > Disease

Integration of metabolism and immunity in periparturient dairy cows


Integration of metabolism and immunity in periparturient dairy cows



Transition cows: Dramatically increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and peripheral lipolysis without excessive ketogenesis are critical for successful transition into lactation These same metabolic adaptations are important to maximize immune function of the periparturient cow. Current nutritional recommendations to support immunity are mostly based on knowledge of immunological concepts and are not "requirements" that were established to maximize immunity.


Infection occurs when a population of invading pathogens (i.e., bacteria, viruses, protozoa, etc.) becomes established within another living organism. Infections of the mammary gland (mastitis) or uterus (metritis) are common sources of inflammation in lactating dairy cows, particularly during the period around calving (periparturient period). Other health disorders common during this period (e.g., milk fever and ketosis) do not arise from infectious organisms, but instead have metabolic origins. Although the etiologies of infectious and metabolic disorders differ, epidemiologists report a significant association between their occurrences. For example, Curtis et al. (1985) reported that cows with milk fever were 5.4 times more likely to contract clinical mastitis than animals without milk fever. These data do not imply cause and effect; however, they suggest an association between the occurrence of one disease and the occurrence of a second disorder. Recent research highlights the interplay between the metabolic and immune systems such that we should not be surprised at the association between clinical events. Researchers and dairy advisors need to begin to think about nutrition and immunity not as exclusive concepts, but rather as integrated systems whereby the activity or events in one system have direct effects on the other.


To understand how one health disorder might impact the occurrence of another, it becomes necessary to understand the events of immunophysiology and metabolism in the animal afflicted with only one disorder. Gram negative bacteria are responsible for the pathology of many diseases in livestock production. In dairy cattle, these organisms are responsible for neonatal coliform septicemia, coliform mastitis, salmonellosis, certain pneumonias, brucellosis, metritis, and multiple other types of infections (Cullor, 1992). These organisms cause a series of predictable disturbances to the normal metabolic and physiologic processes of the host that result in morbidity, if not mortality.

Using coliform mastitis as an example for infection, the pathogenic organism first gains entry to the mammary gland and eventually localizes to the mammary epithelium. En route to colonizing the mammary epithelium, the infectious organism may be detected by white blood cells (leukocytes) of the innate immune system such as monocytes, macrophages, or polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and be destroyed, thereby averting colonization and infection.; When secreted in milk, leukocytes are known as somatic cells. Thus, the somatic cell count in milk increases at times when significant numbers of pathogens have gained access to the gland. However, when pathogens outnumber leukocytes, or when leukocyte function is impaired (such as during periparturient immunosuppression), replicating populations of pathogen may become established and the tissue becomes infected. When leukocytes engage pathogens, they secrete various signaling molecules such as cytokines and chemokines. These signaling molecules diffuse from the site of infection and result in the recruitment of more leukocytes out of the blood to the site of infection, in this case, the mammary gland.

Cytokines also enter the blood stream and can affect the metabolism of many other tissues including the endocrine glands and liver. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-a), interleukin-1b (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) act on endocrine glands to affect the release of insulin, glucagon, glucocorticoids, growth hormone, thyroxine, (Klasing, 1988) and prolactin (Smith and Wagner, 1984). In turn, these hormones may feedback to affect cytokine production from monocytes and macrophages (Pettipher et al., 1996). Direct action of cytokines and changes in circulating hormone levels of the host result in altered patterns of energy and protein metabolism characteristic of the immune response (Fong and Lowry, 1990; Klasing, 1988).

Aspects of periparturient metabolism

The periparturient dairy cow transitioning from pregnancy into lactation, experiences a dramatic increase in nutrient requirements that cannot be met by feed intake alone (Bell, 1995). Thus, the animal experiences a period of negative energy balance and must mobilize body tissue lipid and protein in order to sustain productive function. Estimates of demand for glucose, amino acids, fatty acids, and net energy by the gravid uterus at 250 d of gestation in comparison with the lactating mammary gland at 4 d postpartum indicate approximately a tripling of demand for glucose, a doubling of demand for amino acids, and approximately a 5-fold increase in demand for fatty acids during this timeframe (Bell, 1995). Furthermore, the requirement for calcium increases approximately four-fold on the day of parturition (Horst et al., 1997). Delicate coordination of hepatic gluconeogenesis, fatty acid, and calcium metabolism are of paramount importance if the animal is to avoid metabolic dysfunction. The cow is mostly dependent on the production of glucose (gluconeogenesis) from propionate, glucogenic amino acids, lactate, and glycerol in the liver and kidney to meet her glucose needs (Reynolds et al., 2003). During the period of periparturient negative energy balance, body fat is mobilized into the bloodstream in the form of nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA). These NEFA cannot be used to make glucose but are an important fuel source for body tissues such as muscle and are incorporated into milk fat; however, excessive mobilization of NEFA results in uptake of NEFA by the liver beyond that required to support hepatic oxidative processes. Impairment of liver function can occur as excess NEFA accumulate as triglycerides in the liver (Overton et al., 2000; Overton and Waldron, 2004).

With the onset of copious milk secretion and its attendant drain on plasma calcium concentrations, calcium homeostasis is maintained by the actions of parathyroid hormone and 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 via increased bone resorption and intestinal absorption. During early lactation, these processes cannot fully meet the calcium needs secreted in milk and most cows experience negative calcium balance resulting in at least some degree of hypocalcemia (Horst et al., 1994). Intracellular calcium is important in many signaling pathways and is obligate for normal functioning of neural and muscular tissue. When plasma calcium becomes too low, nerve and muscle function is impaired, resulting in parturient paresis, or milk fever (Goff and Horst, 1997). Animals that do not develop milk fever efficiently mobilize bone tissue to contribute to the circulating pools of calcium and phosphorus. Animals that develop milk fever do not have efficient bone resorption and therefore become hypocalcemic and hypophosphatemic.

Immunosuppression: An interaction between metabolism and immunophysiology

In addition to the potential hepatic metabolic disease associated with negative energy balance, periparturient dairy cows also undergo a period of reduced immunological capacity during the weeks around calving. This immune dysfunction is not limited to isolated immune parameters; rather it is broad in scope and affects multiple functions of various immune cell types. The combined results of these dysfunctions are that dairy cows may be hyposensitive and hyporesponsive to antigen, and therefore more susceptible to infectious disease such as mastitis during the periparturient period (Mallard et al., 1998).

Grommers et al. (1989) reported that fewer mammary quarters responded to low-dose E. coli endotoxin, and maximum cell count also was somewhat later and less pronounced during early lactation than during mid-lactation. Furthermore, when live E. coli were administered into the mammary gland, periparturient cows experienced more rapid bacterial growth, higher peak bacterial concentration, higher fever, and equal or greater proinflammatory cytokine concentrations in foremilk than did midlactation cows (Shuster et al., 1996).

The cause of this immunosuppression is not known, but is the subject of much research. Research to date suggests that periparturient immunosuppression appears to be due to a combination of endocrine and metabolic factors. Glucocorticoids (e.g. cortisol), known immunosuppressants, are elevated around the time of calving, and have been postulated to be at least partly responsible for periparturient immunosuppression (Burton et al., 1995). Furthermore, changes in estradiol and progesterone just prior to calving may directly or indirectly affect immunocompetence (Weber et al., 2001).

Effects of metabolism on immunocompetence

Periparturient negative energy balance has also been implicated in contributing to immunosuppression. However, negative energy balance alone had little effect on the expression of adhesion molecules on the surface of bovine leukocytes (Perkins et al., 2001). Furthermore, negative energy balance in midlactation cows did not affect the clinical symptoms associated with an intramammary endotoxin infusion (Perkins et al., 2002). These results are contrary to work in periparturient cows where the presence of a mammary gland (vs. mastectomized cows) and its attendant metabolic demands slowed recovery of neutrophil function, suggesting that the metabolic stress of lactation exacerbated periparturient immunosuppression (Kimura et al., 1999).

Other work has investigated individual metabolic components associated with negative energy balance, and has concluded that although hypoglycemia alone is not likely to exacerbate periparturient immunosuppression (Nonnecke et al., 1992), hyperketonemia appears to have multiple negative effects on aspects of immune function (Suriyasathaporn et al., 2000). Ketosis may increase the risk of mastitis in periparturient immunosuppressed cattle because many immune cell types are negatively affected by metabolite levels typical of a ketotic environment (i.e., low concentrations of glucose and high concentrations of ketone bodies and NEFA).

A ketotic environment suppressed bovine lymphocyte blastogenesis (Sato et al., 1995), decreased the respiratory burst activity of PMN (Hoeben et al., 1997), lowered the chemotactic capacity of leukocytes (Suriyasathaporn et al., 1999), decreased interferon-g and tumor necrosis factor-a titers from bovine aorta endothelial cells (Zdzisinska et al., 2000), decreased the bactericidal activity of ovine neutrophils (Sartorelli et al., 2000), and inhibited human T-cell proliferation in vitro (Gregory et al., 1993). Furthermore, experimental mastitis in ketonemic cows was more severe than mastitis in non-ketonemic cows regardless of preinfection chemotactic response (Kremer et al., 1993). As reviewed by Suriyasathaporn et al. (2000), impairment of the udder defense mechanism in cows experiencing negative energy balance seems to be related to hyperketonemia.

Reports of the negative effects of ketosis on immune function may be related to or compounded by the impact of fatty liver on immune function. As previously discussed, triglyceride accumulation in the liver is reported to reduce hepatic ureagenic and perhaps gluconeogenic capacity, but fatty liver also affects immune function. Andersen et al. (1996) reported that cows without fatty liver cleared bacterial endotoxin from circulation within 30 min of intravenous endotoxin administration, whereas cows with fatty liver were unable to clear the administered endotoxin even after 6 h. Furthermore, these authors reported that whereas zero of 18 healthy cows had severe reactions to endotoxin administration, one of four cows with fatty liver died following endotoxin administration. Zerbe et al. (2000) reported that PMN harvested from the blood or uterus of periparturient cows with liver triglyceride greater than 40 mg/g had decreased expression of functional surface molecules and had decreased in vitro functional capacity (cytotoxicity and reactive oxygen species generation). Reid and Roberts (1983) reported preliminary results whereby cows with fatty liver displayed decreased neutrophil extravasation in vitro and Hill et al. (1985) reported that cows with fatty liver took significantly longer to resolve intramammary infection than did cows without hepatic lipidosis. Other aspects of metabolic status were not reported in these studies, so it is unknown to what extent fatty liver was solely responsible for the reported results; however, it seems clear that indeed fatty liver and attendant metabolic perturbations negatively impact immune function in dairy cattle.

Research methods in lactating cattle

The inflammatory response to Gram-negative bacterial infection is caused by the host reaction to endotoxin, the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) cell wall component of Gram-negative bacteria (Luderitz et al., 1984). Purified LPS administered to animals results in clinical symptoms similar to those caused by bacterial infection, without the colonization of the tissue by a live organism (Steiger et al., 1999; Takeuchi et al., 1997; Memon et al., 1992). These symptoms include lethargy, respiratory distress, transitory hyperthermia followed by hypothermia, decreased systemic blood pressure, increased heart rate followed by decreased cardiac output, diarrhea, changes in blood cell counts, and alterations in the blood coagulation system (Cullor, 1992). Metabolic disturbances also accompany these clinical symptoms of endotoxemia. For example, anorexia, as well as alterations in carbohydrate, fat, protein, and mineral metabolism are all components of the immune response elicited by LPS (Klasing, 1988). The metabolic inflammatory response to bacterial sepsis or LPS administration is mediated primarily via endocrine and cytokine control; there is little effect of LPS directly on tissues (Filkins and Buchanan, 1977).

Effects at acute experimental mastitis on periparturient metabolism

A significant body of research has examined the effects of nutrition and metabolism on immune function. For example, dietary supplementation with certain trace minerals and vitamins improved immunity (Spears, 2000; Weiss, 1998) and the hyperketonemia that is common during early lactation is reported to have multiple negative effects on several aspects of immunocompetence (Suriyasathaporn et al., 2000). Furthermore, aspects of immune activation that affect milk synthetic physiology have also received significant attention (Shuster et al., 1995; Shuster et al., 1991; Shuster and Harmon, 1992). The potential causal mechanistic relationship between mastitis and metabolic disease has received little attention. We hypothesized that immune activation of early-lactation dairy cows using an experimental mastitis model initiated by the intramammary infusion of bacterial LPS would result in quantitative changes in energy and mineral metabolism that would cause the development of periparturient metabolic disorders.

On day 7 of lactation, multiparous cows were administered intramammary LPS to cause experimental mastitis or sterile saline (control cows) and physiological measurements were made to study the metabolism of these in animals. Saline-treated cows were pair-fed with an individual LPS-infused cow such that the effects of LPS infusion would not be confounded with feed intake. Among the physiologic methods employed, a primed continuous infusion of stable isotopically labeled glucose (D2-glucose) was administered to serve as a “tracer” for the measure of glucose kinetics.

Variables that might be associated with the fatty-liver/ketosis complex were not negatively affected during the early stages of acute mastitis. Plasma glucose concentration was slightly increased, glucose rate of appearance into plasma was increased (Figure 1), and plasma NEFA (Figure 2) and BHBA (Figure 3) concentrations were decreased in mastitic cows relative to the pair-fed control cows. Among variables that might be associated with the development of milk fever, plasma concentrations of both, calcium (Figure 4) and phosphorus were significantly decreased during the early hours of mastitis.

Figure 1.

Plasma glucose rate of appearance (a)determined after plateau enrichment of plasma glucose with dideuterated glucose into early-lactation dairy cows administered intramammary lipopolysaccharide or saline at 0 minutes (b). Data were covariately adjusted using the mean rate of appearance during the steady state period from -90 through 0 minutes.

(a) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean at each time-point

(b) treatment by time effect, P < 0.01

Figure 2.

Plasma nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) concentration (a) following intramammary lipopolysaccharide or saline infusion into early-lactation dairy cows (b). Means were adjusted by analysis of covariance using the mean NEFA concentration for each treatment group from –240 through 0 minutes relative to intramammary infusion.

(a) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean at each time-point

(b) treatment by time effect, P < 0.01

Figure 3.

Plasma b-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) concentration (a) following intramammary lipopolysaccharide or saline infusion into early-lactation dairy cows (b). Means were adjusted by analysis of covariance using the mean BHBA concentration for each treatment group from –240 through 0 minutes relative to intramammary infusion.

(a) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean at each time-point

(b) treatment by time effect, P < 0.01

Figure 4.

Plasma calcium concentration (a) following intramammary lipopolysaccharide or saline infusion into early-lactation dairy cows (b). Means were adjusted by analysis of covariance using the mean calcium concentration for each treatment group from –240 through 0 minutes relative to intramammary infusion.

(a) Error bars represent the standard error of the mean at each time-point

(b) treatment by time effect, P < 0.01

These results suggest that the metabolism of periparturient cows is altered by activation of the immune system. The integration of the immune response with metabolic systems appears to protect the cow from energy-related metabolic disturbances, but this integration of response may not be adequate to maintain normal blood mineral concentrations in the periparturient cow. It is possible that hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia may contribute to the clinical signs of acute mastitis (e.g., weakness and recumbency), and it is plausible that they could contribute to the secondary incidence of metabolic disease including milk fever, displaced abomasum, and retained placenta. The effects of sustained inflammation (i.e., 24-72 hours) on energy and mineral metabolism is warranted before further conclusions should be made.

Practical recommendations

It is evident that the effects of nutrition and immunity are interrelated. Nutritional physiology impacts immune function and immune activity alters metabolism. At this time, specific recommendations to optimize nutritional immunology are difficult because research is lacking. Our current nutritional recommendations are based on the amount of a given nutrient that will result in no deficiency symptoms for the nutrient and maximizes productive processes (e.g., growth, milk production). However, the amount of that same nutrient that maximizes immunity may be very different.

At this time, our best recommendations in feeding for optimal nutritional immunity are concept-based. That is, we don’t know the specific requirements yet, but we are beginning to understand some of the nutrients that impact immune function, and we can therefore nutritionally manage the animal to optimize those nutrients and/or metabolites. For example, we know that many trace minerals and vitamins are important in immune function. We don’t know what level of these nutrients maximizes immunity, but we do know that deficiencies impair immunity. Therefore, we strive to meet or exceed NRC (2001) requirements with these nutrients coming from high quality sources. Another example of concept-based feeding regards managing the periparturient dairy cow to minimize negative energy balance. We know that excessive plasma NEFA and ketone-body metabolism can impair immunity, therefore we must attempt to manage the animal such that plasma NEFA and BHBA concentrations remain at moderate levels. To accomplish this we can incorporate the same strategies as those to maximize metabolic health in fresh cows – namely, balanced pre- and post-calving diets, excellent feeding management, monitoring fresh cows to identify potential problems quickly, and minimizing stress on these animals.


The periparturient period of the lactation cycle in dairy cattle is a critical period in determining profitability of the dairy farm enterprise. Productivity for the lactation is established as a result of events that occur during the periparturient period and disorders such as parturient paresis, retained placenta, displaced abomasum, ketosis, and mastitis are correlated with each other and occur primarily during this timeframe (Curtis et al., 1985). Dramatically increased hepatic gluconeogenesis and peripheral lipolysis without excessive ketogenesis are critical if the cow is to successfully transition into lactation, and the liver is the primary organ supporting these metabolic changes. Failure of this coordination results in metabolic disease such as fatty liver, lactation ketosis, and displaced abomasum. Research also suggests that these same metabolic adaptations are important in maximizing immune function of the periparturient cow. Furthermore, periparturient mastitis alters these adaptations and may also affect the metabolic health of the cow. Current nutritional recommendations to support immunity are mostly based on our knowledge of immunological concepts and are not “requirements” that were established to maximize immunity.


Andersen, P. H., N. Jarlov, M. Hesselholt, and L. Baek. 1996. Studies on in vivo endotoxin plasma disappearance times in cattle. J. Vet. Med. 43:93-101.

Bell, A. W. 1995. Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2804-2819.

Burton, J. L., M. E. Kehrli, Jr, S. Kapil., and R. L. Horst. 1995. Regulation of L-selectin and CD18 on bovine neutrophils by glucocorticoids: effects of cortisol and dexamethasone. J. Leukoc. Biol. 57:317-325.

Cullor, J. S. 1992. Shock attributable to bacteremia and endotoxemia in cattle: Clinical and experimental findings. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 200:1894-1902.

Curtis, C. R, H. N. Erb, C. J. Sniffen, R. D. Smith, and D. S. Kronfeld. 1985. Path analysis of dry period nutrition, postpartum metabolic and reproductive disorders,and mastitis in Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 68:2347-2360.

Filkins, J. P. and B. J. Buchanan. 1977. In vivo vs. in vitro effects of endotoxin on glycogenolysis, gluconeogenesis, and glucose utilization. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 155:216-218.

Fong, Y., and S. F. Lowry. 1990. Tumor necrosis factor in the pathophysiology of infection and sepsis. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 55:157-170.

Goff, J. P. and R. L. Horst. 1997. Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1260-1268.

Gregory R, J. McElveen, R. B. Tattersall, and I. Todd. 1993. The effects of 3-hydroxybutyrate and glucose on human T cell responses to Candida albicans. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 7:315-320.

Grommers, F. J., D. Van De Geer, H. Van Der Vliet, P. A. J. Henricks, and F. P. Nijkamp. 1989. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte function: relationship between induced migration into the bovine mammary gland and in vitro cell activity. Vet. Immunol. Immunopath. 23:75-83.

Hill, A. W., I. M. Reid, and R. A. Collins. 1985. Influence of liver fat on experimental Escherichia coli mastitis in periparturient cows. Vet. Rec. 117:549-551.

Hoeben, D., R. Heyneman, and C. Burvenich. 1997. Elevated levels of β-hydroxybutyric acid in periparturient cows and in vitro effect on respiratory burst activity of bovine neutrophils. Vet. Immunol. Immunopath. 58:165-170.

Horst, R. L., J. P. Goff, and T. A. Reinhardt. 1994. Calcium and vitamin D metabolism in the dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1936-1951.

Horst, R. L., J. P. Goff, T. A. Reinhardt, and D. R. Buxton. 1997. Strategies for preventing milk fever in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1269-1280.

Kimura, K., J. P. Goff, and M. E. Kehrli, Jr. 1999. Effects of the presence of the mammary gland on expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules and myeloperoxidase activity in periparturient dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2385-2392.

Klasing, K.C. 1988. Nutritional aspects of leukocytic cytokines. J. Nutr. 118:1436-1446.

Kremer, W. D., E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, F. J. Grommers, Y. H. Schukken, R. Heeringa, A. Brand, and C. Burvenich. 1993. Severity of experimental Escherichia coli mastitis in ketonemic and nonketonemic dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3428-3436.

Luderitz, O., K. Tanamoto, C. Galanos, G. R. McKenzie, H. Brade, U. Zahringer, E. T. Rietschel, S. Kusumoto, and T. Shiba. 1984. Lipopolysaccharides: Structural principles and biologic activities. Rev. Infect. Dis. 6:428-431.

Mallard, B. A., J. C. Dekkers, M. J. Ireland, K. E. Leslie, S. Sharif, C. Lacey Vankampen, L. Wagter, and B. N. Wilkie. 1998. Alteration in immune responsiveness during the periparturient period and its ramification on dairy cow and calf health. J. Dairy Sci. 81:585-595.

Memon, R. A., K. R. Feingold, A. H. Moser, W. Doerrler, S. Adi, C. A. Dinarello, and C. Grunfeld. 1992. Differential effects of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor on ketogenesis. Am. J. Physiol. 263:E301-E309.

Nonnecke, B. J., S. T. Franklin, and J. W. Young. 1992. Effects of ketones, acetate, and glucose on in vitro immunoglobulin secretion by bovine lymphocytes. J. Dairy Sci. 75:982-990.

NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Overton, T. R., M. S. Piepenbrink, and M. R. Waldron. 2000. Interactions of liver metabolism and health in transition dairy cows. Page 251 in Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. Feed Manuf., Rochester, NY. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Overton, T. R., and M. R. Waldron. 2004. Nutritional management of transition dairy cows: strategies to optimize metabolic health. J. Dairy Sci. 87:E105-119E.

Perkins, K. H., M. J. VandeHaar, R. J. Tempelman, and J. L. Burton. 2001. Negative energy balance does not decrease expression of leukocyte adhesion or antigen-presenting molecules in cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 84:421-428.

Perkins, K. H., M. J. VandeHaar, J. L. Burton, J. S. Liesman, R. J. Erskine, and T. H. Elsasser. 2002. Clinical responses to intramammary endotoxin infusion in dairy cows subjected to feed restriction. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1724-1731.

Pettipher, E. R., J. M. Labasi, E. D. Salter, E. J. Stam, J. B. Cheng, and R. J. Griffiths. 1996. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor production by adrenal hormones in vivo: insights into the anti inflammatory activity of rolipram. Br. J. Pharmacol. 117:1530-1534.

Reid, I. M., and C. J. Roberts. 1983. Subclinical fatty liver in dairy cows – current research and future prospects. Irish Vet. J. 37:104-110.

Reynolds, C. K., P. C. Aikman, B. Lupoli, D. J. Humphries, and D. E. Beever. 2003. Splanchnic metabolism of dairy cows during the transition from late gestation through early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1201-1217.

Sartorelli, P., S. Paltrinieri, and S. Comazzi. 2000. Non-specific immunity and ketone bodies. II: In vitro studies on adherence and superoxide anion production in ovine neutrophils. J. Vet. Med. A. Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 47:1-8.Sato, S., T. Suzuki, and K. Okada. 1995. Suppression of mitogenic response of bovine peripheral blood lymphocytes by ketone bodies. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 57:183-185.

Shuster D. E. and R. J. Harmon. 1992. High cortisol concentrations and mediation of the hypogalactia during endotoxin-induced mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 75:739-746.

Shuster, D. E., E. K. Lee, and M. E. Jr., Kehrli. 1996. Bacterial growth, inflammatory cytokine production, and neutrophil recruitment during coliform mastitis in cows within ten days after calving, compared with cows at midlactation. Am. J. Vet. Res. 57:1569-1575.

Shuster, D. E., M. E. Kehrli, Jr, C. R. Baumrucker. 1995. Relationship of inflammatory cytokines, growth hormone, and insulin-like growth factor-I to reduced performance during infectious disease. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 210:140-149.

Shuster, D. E., R. J. Harmon, J. A. Jackson, and R. W. Hemken. 1991. Suppression of milk production during endotoxin-induced mastitis. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3763-3774.

Smith, B. B., and W. C. Wagner. 1984. Supression of prolactin in pigs by Escherichia coli endotoxin. Science. 224:605-607.

Spears, J. W. 2000. Micronutrients and immune function in cattle. Proc. Nutr. Soc.; 59:587-594.

Steiger, M., M. Senn, G. Altreuther, D. Werling, F. Sutter, M. Kreuzer, and W. Langhans. 1999. Effect of a prolonged low-dose lipopolysaccharide infusion on feed intake and metabolism in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 77:2523-2532.

Suriyasathaporn, W., A. J. Daemen, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, S. J. Dieleman, M. Nielen, and Y. H. Schukken. 1999. Beta-hydroxybutyrate levels in peripheral blood and ketone bodies supplemented in culture media affect the in vitro chemotaxis of bovine leukocytes. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 68:177-186.

Suriyasathaporn, W., C. Heuer, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen, and Y. H. Schukken. 2000. Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. Vet. Res. 31:397-412.

Takeuchi, Y., T. Kikusui, O. Kizumi, H. Ohnishi, and Y. Mori. 1997. Pathophysiological changes evoked by lipopolysaccharide administration in goats. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 59:125-127.

Weber, P. S., S. A. Madsen, G. W. Smith, J. J. Ireland, and J. L. Burton. 2001. Pre-translational regulation of neutrophil L-selectin in glucocorticoid-challenged cattle. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 83:213-240.

Weiss, W. P. 1998. Requirements of fat-soluble vitamins for dairy cows: a review.; J. Dairy Sci. 81:2493-2501.

Zdzisinska B., J. Filar, R. Paduch, J. Kaczor, I. Lokaj, and M. Kandefer-Szerszen. 2000. The influence of ketone bodies and glucose on interferon, tumor necrosis factor production and NO release in bovine aorta endothelial cells. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 74:237-247.

Zerbe, H., N. Schneider, W. Liebold, T. Wensing, T. A. Kruip, and H. J. Schuberth. 2000. Altered functional and immunophenotypical properties of neutrophylic granulocytes in postpartum cows associated with fatty liver. Theriogenol. 54:771-786.